Our experiments aim to prove concepts that will make AR experiences feel intuitive and effortless

At around, we developed this concept for the Interiors of The Future Contest hosted by ArtStation. As the name suggests, the challenge was to design a futuristic living space.

Our concept envisions a smart home interior integrated with AR interfaces, seamlessly blending technology with daily life. The design explores how augmented reality could enhance both functionality and aesthetics in modern living spaces, creating an environment that is innovative, intuitive, and forward-thinking.

The idea of blending the natural with the technological has long been one of our core explorations. In this project, we studied how plants could “communicate” with humans through augmented-reality interfaces. Our goal was to create visual systems that reflect the organic rhythms and forms of the plants themselves, translating their behavior into a clear and sensory AR language.

This experiment explores which UI elements a saber hilt can include to support maintenance. The gaze-based interaction has three stages: when the object is out of sight, no UI appears; when it’s centered in view, subtle hints show up; and at closer focus, the full UI is revealed. A subtle but technically complex feature is also included—real-time reflections of UI elements on the hilt’s surface, helping the AR layer blend seamlessly with the physical object.

This experiment adds visual complexity to the AR layer, making it rich in detail without feeling overloaded. Every part of the hilt can be examined closely, with wireframe overlays and contextual explanations (if you can read Aurebesh!). The same gaze-based interaction model is used — parts are selected by centering them in the frame.

This experiment adds visual complexity to the AR layer, making it rich in detail without feeling overloaded. Every part of the hilt can be examined closely, with wireframe overlays and contextual explanations (if you can read Aurebesh!). The same gaze-based interaction model is used — parts are selected by centering them in the frame.

This experiment adds visual complexity to the AR layer, making it rich in detail without feeling overloaded. Every part of the hilt can be examined closely, with wireframe overlays and contextual explanations (if you can read Aurebesh!). The same gaze-based interaction model is used — parts are selected by centering them in the frame.

Use the Force (or hand-tracking) to reveal an exploded view of the hilt and discover what it’s made of. A handy feature for young Padawans — or just those who can’t read Aurebesh. This experience was created using a combination of model tracking and hand tracking in a single scene.

In this experiment, the goal was maximum realism—making the realtime AR UI feel seamlessly integrated into the live camera feed. The depth of field of virtual elements matches the real footage, and glowing UI components cast reflections and light onto the hilt’s metal surfaces. These details may seem excessive by today’s AR standards, but they’ll become essential once AR enters everyday life.

Glassmorphism has become popular in recent years, and it’s evolving nicely in XR — especially with the arrival of Apple’s VisionOS. But on a transparent, see-through AR display, there’s no static background to blur. By using the device’s raw camera feed, however, we can still create a matte, glass-like effect. This experiment was recorded through the Magic Leap 2, and while the video can’t fully replicate how the blur looks to the user, it shows that glassmorphism is indeed possible on this type of display.

Hand-tracking exploration featuring a 3D, four-value dynamic chart — with rotation speed controlled by the thumb. Why would you need one in the palm of your hand? We don’t know yet…

Hand-tracking exploration featuring layers of circular graphics placed between the index finger and thumb, transforming based on the distance between them. What does it do? Or mean? We don’t know yet — but it looks cool.

Hand-tracking exploration featuring a HUD-like abstract UI that unfolds based on the available “field of view” — defined by the space between the user’s hands. An experimental way to reveal different levels of functionality depending on the user’s momentary needs and context.

Spatial typography doodle around David of Michelangelo. It’s impressive how precisely the model tracking occludes the glyphs behind the sculpture.

The cube works great as a medium for testing and presenting typefaces in AR — from different angles, distances, and in motion. One neat trick we’ve learned: adjusting character spacing at extreme angles to maintain legibility. Check out the “Geometria” title for this effect.

Two players, different games — same checkerboard. So why add extra menus when you can simply rotate the board to make a selection? Physical interaction just works in AR.

After choosing the game, why not rotate the board just a little further… and choose the dark side?

When you’re not familiar with the game rules or hidden best practices, AR can reveal them for you. Just don’t let your opponent know your glasses are smart…